Thursday, 29 March 2012

Personal Media Use & Production Diary


Personal media use & production diary
Name: Merry McDonnell
Student number: s4285498

Introduction:

This is the very first assessment of Introduction to Journalism - a diary documenting my personal media use.
Over the period of 10 days, I have recorded my interaction with different forms of media. This recording has included my interests in broadcast, print and Internet media. This post will analyse the results of my media diary. The media outlets will be organized into categories:
  • ·      ‘News & Journalism’;
  • ·      ‘Communication’; and
  • ·      ‘Entertainment’.

‘News and Journalism’ will fundamentally include broadcast and print media. ‘Communication’ will include situations where I am able to communicate with others and vice versa. Finally ‘Entertainment’ will include media outlets that I typically use for entertainment purposes only. Although these categories cross over frequently and share media outlets (i.e. all three categories are available via the internet), I believe that the organisation is useful and clear.


Findings:

Over the course of the 10-day recording period, I had spent a total of 54 hours and 15 minutes using media outlets. The extent of this use was very surprising to me as the total number of hours is over 2 full days of constant media usage. Although I used a great deal of this media as forms of entertainment and socialising, the total quantum of time I had devoted to media use was shocking.
Throughout this post, I will be comparing my media usage results with a media survey taken by all students in 1111 Introduction to Journalism and Communication.

News & Journalism

My use of this category of media was surprisingly small. Only 11% of my media use was related to broadcast and print news. Of this 11%, the largest proportion (33% was spent listening to the radio), with 5 % of my overall media usage being radio related.  Just over one-half (54 %) of my 1111 class also listens to the radio for less than an hour on a daily basis and most (83%) of these students listen while in the car. My radio use is typical of my student peers.
Overall, my use of online newspapers was lower than my 1111 class peers.  The news website News.com, the U.Q. Library website and podcasts each accounted for 2% of my overall media usage. I did not use online newspapers during the diary period (i.e. recording 0% usage of online newspapers). This is well below the average of my student peers, with 69% of 1111 students indicating that they had received their news via online newspapers. This is supported by 41% of 1111 students stating that they read news online, while I spent less than 2% of my media usage reading news online.
My use of podcasts is also below the average expressed by 1111 students. A small proportion (6%) of 1111 students claimed to have spent the majority of their online time downloading podcasts.  Personally, I have spent less than 2% of my media usage doing the same. Furthermore, my use of the U.Q. library website was only for university readings.
Finally my use of newspapers/magazines was only 1% of my overall media consumption. I recalled having read one article in the Women’s Weekly. It was, however, interesting. This is below the 1111 student average with 52% of 1111 students claiming to receive their news updates via hard copy newspapers.

News and Journalism Pie Graph

Communication

Compared to other categories, my use of the media communication category was significant, with one-quarter (25 %) of my overall media usage related to communicating. This included acting as a recipient or sender in formats that were either (intended) private or non-private.
A small proportion (12 %) of my overall media consumption was focused on the non-private, interpersonal website Facebook. Disregarding Facebook, my Internet related media (i.e. online news) accounts for only 4% of my overall media usage. Considering 12 % is my highest percentage regarding online media, I fit in well with the 92% of 1111 students who claim to spend most of their online time visiting the Facebook site.
Furthermore, I am like the other 95% of 1111 students who have a Facebook account. Additionally, similar to 95% of 1111 students, I too use the Smart Phone Facebook application.
Finally, the key way in which I differ from my 1111 student peers is that 48% of 1111 students claim to receive their news via Facebook. As I use Facebook for communicating to people I know for leisure purposes, I would not say that I am part of this group.
All of my other uses of media communication were comparatively small. My use of the non-private, interpersonal website U.Q. blackboard accounting for 6% of my overall media usage while my use of the Blog, a non-private, mainly sender (myself) only communicating website, accounted for 4%. 
Regarding use of Blogs, I differ substantially to the majority of my 1111 student peers.  Of these students, about one-third (33%) of 1111 students spend most of their online time reading the Blogs of others, whilst I do not. Furthermore, most (59%) of 1111 students at the time of taking the media survey did not have a Blog. Unlike these students, I already had one Blog, in line with the 41% of 1111 students who also blog.
My use of the (intended) private, sender/recipient functioning U.Q. email accounted for 2% of my overall media usage. This is in marked difference to the 53% of 1111 students who claimed to spend most of their online time focused on emailing. I would say I am below this average as I spend very little time viewing and sending emails.
I do not actively use Twitter or Skype and neither were used during the diary period. Similar to about 90% of 1111 students, I do not spend most of my online time using Twitter. In contrast to most (80%) of 1111 students, I use the Smart Phone Twitter application. Furthermore, in line with most (88%) 1111 students, I do not receive my news via Twitter. However, at the time of gathering data for the media survey, unlike most (68% 1111 students, I only had one Twitter account. In line with the feedback from most (75%) 1111 students, I did not spend most of my online time using Skype.  This evidence shows that I mostly rely on the Facebook and Email media outlets for communicating.

Communication Pie Graph


Entertainment

My use of the entertainment media category was the largest, with a majority (61%) of my media usage related to entertainment. This includes my using media for mostly relaxation or enjoyment purposes.
The largest proportion (30%) of my overall media consumption was watching television. The majority (30%) of 1111 students (myself included) watch television for 1-2 hours per day. On average, I watched 1.6 hours of television per day during the 10-day period, which is inline with the viewing habits of my peers. The majority of my television viewing was spent watching non-news related shows, although a large portion of my television viewing was related to morning and evening news and this is inline with other 1111 students – 71% of whom receive their news in this way. Furthermore, differing to my peers, I do not watch television programs/shows online (which is done by 37% of 1111 students).
Other entertainment media use included:
·      12 % of my media use was watching movies
·      9% was spent reading novels and using smart phone applications (music).
Like other 1111 students (44%), I too have an Internet enabled smart phone. I use my Iphone mostly to listen to music, although the Iphone is fundamentally for communication. Most (89%) 1111 students listen to music using their smart phone or iPod.

Entertainment Pie Graph

Conclusion

Overall, the experience of reviewing my media and production diary has been eye opening. While I was surprised by the overall quantum of time I spent using media, I did not realise how little time I spent reviewing information from the more respectable news outlets and sources. I have, however, not been surprised regarding the amount of attention Facebook and smart phones both receive from my peers and myself.
Reference: Dr Bruce Redman – 2012 – Media survey - http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/MPHPL7K

Appendix A – Media diary



Sunday, 25 March 2012

Lecture 5- "Radio is the theatre of the mind"

Steve Austin-

"On radio, its not about who's right or wrong, its about having perspective. Its not about me, it's about you."

"Depending on the slot, and talent. People can tell when you're fake on radio, so I persuade people who are genuine."

Up close and personal- "I get a gut from peoples boy language about their trust with me. So I will try and empathise with the guest. If you speak tenderly to someone you love, they'll know it. If you wouldn't say it in life, don't say it on radio."

People to ring in- "Asking listeners if they agree with an opinion thats just been stated. The simpler the question, the more response from people. Make it easy on the listener."


Components of a good radio story- "being a human, and searching for the experience of the human conition. Seek the emotional response in people. We are emotional creatures, driving by experiences. For night time radio, listen more than talk. Listening implies respect."

Lecture 5- Notes continued. Telling stories on radio.

Richard is explaining how he accidentally got involved in radio. Lucky guy. That radio is a much more intimate medium in comparison to Television. Multi tasking is often something listeners do. (driving etc) Letting listeners feel included in the conversation.

Conversations- an hour long interview with one (sometimes two) guests. He looks for people we haven't heard. A human story, or a story of ideas. Will the story last for an hour. Richard HAS to be interested.

I never knew that Richard interviewed Gough Whitlam!

Public radio- Richard says its thriving at the moment. "Using the new podcasting technologies, we're reaching people everywhere. Using twitter is great too"

To maintain warmth as a presenter, Richard has a picture of his listeners. "I think of a picture of my wife, when we'd just had kids and were stuck at home. How radio connects her to what's real, funny, interesting, someone who needs a break. A 30-40 year old audience maybe. But people in their 20's listen to. People who want to remain contemporaty. Be useful and give them something. It's a public service here."

Wisdom from Richard- "Worldliness, reading the paper, keep reading, asking questions, be open, expose yourself to ideas of people you don't agree with. You'll know yourself better for it"


Week 5 Lecture: Richard Fidler

What A surprise! Richard Fidler is the special guest for our Jour 1111 lecture! How lovely! My mum and I listen to him all the time. This should be interesting. 

A link to his background. I wanted to see his face. Odd I know, but it became important as soon as I heard his voice on the mp3 recording. Odd. I never had the same urge when listening to him on ABC.

A Blank Canvas- an article on 'Discovery at UQ'

While reading Discovery at UQ I found an article relating to one of the Intro to Journalism 1111 lectures. We the students of 1111 learnt about Web 2.0 platforms in the second lecture. The social media side of the internet and generating a sense of "identity" using web 2.0 platforms (taken from the Blank Canvas article).

This article put a new spin on the same information for me. Page 24 for A Blank Canvas
http://www.uq.edu.au/research/downloads/Report/discovery-UQ-2011.pdf

Monday, 19 March 2012

Lecture 4- Capturing the moment

From the Mail Online- 


Some others from Google images-



Lecture 4- Photo journalism: Capturing the moment

Bellow is a link to an online story from 'The Telegraph.' A perfect example of 'capturing the moment' from photographer Lex Augusteijn - 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturepicturegalleries/7953723/High-speed-photographs-by-Lex-Augusteijn-capture-the-moment-a-bullet-hits-objects.html

Lecture 4 - Photo stories

The focus of this lecture is photo journalism. :) This is an area that I feel particularly confident in, as I have previously studied Photomedia (a photography subject at QUT) and am currently studying Communication 1999 at UQ. This Lecture was the best so far in my opinion (a close second is the jelly beans one, for obvious reasons) because it was fun. Simple.

We essentially discussed how stories, morals, messages are communicated through images. In particular we discussed cave drawings, how they can date back to 50,000 years ago. Stained glass windows in churches, the religious teachings for those who could not read. Along with other more modern image influences on culture. Including a short film from Dove. Showing a models transformation from normal everyday, to a distorted, hardly real person on a billboard. The face of 'Beauty'. No wonder we feel its so far from the truth.

Photo journalism:
In the new age of technology, its about Photoshop, Digital enhancement and now we dont have to select only one main image for a story. We can have a gallery of 8 for readers to choose from.

What Makes a good photo/Pictures for TV news:
-Framing
-Focus (digital and what you want the viewer pay attention to)
-Timing (shutter speed/ 'capturing the moment')
-Angle/ Point of view
-Exposure/light
-Inclusion of sound dimensions

Now we know a little more about Photo journalism...

-Merryn

THEN GOD CREATED THE BLOG

It was at this part of the Intro to Jour 1111 journey that I created my blog. The very one you are reading now. It was done in my very first 1111 tutorial. A twitter account and gmail account was also created. And here we are...

Lecture 3- text in Journalism

In Lecture 3 we learnt about text in Journalism. How it operates, is used for online/print Journalism and how they are different.

Special guest was Skye Doherty- Print Journalist.

Skye explained to us that text is fast, flexible, available for different platforms, portable, searchable and dominates online.

Digital platforms are visual, but what makes these platforms seachable, is text.

Organisation of text in Broadcast news- Inverted Pyramid. Originated in America. The inverted Pyramid format organises the improtant information first. Who, what, when, where, how and why. News values including conflict, control, power, money, sex drugs rock & roll. News values are included in this first paragraph. As the text/story develops, the background, specific and more information on what's actually  happened are stated.

Invertered news Pyramid is great for hard news reporting.

How we package and deliver news: studies have shown that people read from the top left. Thats where the biggest headline and stores are. News values are used to decide what goes where on the front page. Online, is not the same organisation. As online has meta-tags, links and branches to other stories included in stories.

Online news format- Healine, image, caption. The reader has the option to explore main story or alternatively, sub-stoies related. Ultimately, the reader has the power of choice.

Text is:
-story content
-Headlines
-captions
-links and more.

A 'Mast-Head' is name of newspaper, followed by the 'Folio' (date), 'Pointers' (Senior writers use a few words to get readers interested in the newspaper), followed by more Headlines, 'Pull' (main story), Pull quote/box text and more.

This lecture was very informative in regards to how text in news changes depending on the platform (TV/RADOI or ONLINE or PRINT). What I found most interesting was that the information presented to me by Skye I already knew, however she presented it in a new way. For example, I already understood that Online news stories have links included in the content, however I never compared it to  how Print news was presented (obviously with no links but with similar content).




Sunday, 18 March 2012

Lecture 2

Web Literation was a main topic of this lecture.

Web 1. = "Information Web"(taget- companies)

Web 2.0 = "Interactive Web" (target- social groups)

Web 3.0 = "Semantic Web" (targeting individuals)


Web 1.0- "Web 1.0 (the information web), the one we all know and love, is straightforward. It’s full of content that we can surround with ads, mainly in the form of banners. Many marketers look at this as an extension of offline media – print and television. Sadly, they tend to use it the same way.
(Greg Smith, 2009 cited in Harrison:10)" - Lecture 2 slides

Web 2.0- "Produsage can be roughly defined as modes of production which are led by users or at least crucially involve users as producers - in other words, the user acts as a hybrid user/producer, or produser, virtually throughout the production process. Produsage demonstrates the changed content production value chain model in collaborative online environments: in these environments, a strict producer/consumer dichotomy no longer applies - instead, users are almost always also able to be producers of content, and often necessarily so in the very act of using it.”
(http://snurb.info/produsage) - Lecture 2 slides

Web 3.0- "Web 3.0 takes all this a step further adding machine-readable meaning to the packets of information. It is thus known to the technically minded as the semantic web. Once it is manifest the semantic web will take us to within a gnat’s whisker of that utopia in which you have the exact change for a trip from Mornington Crescent to LAX via JFK." - David Bradley 2009. - Lecture 2 slides. 

From what I gathered about Web 3.0 is that its about multi-layered questions, "meta tagging, using smart phones use to locate where people are, what they like. Essesntiall tracking peoples interests and what appeals to the individual. Quite like when you purchase something on amazon.com and there are suggestions in the 'Other books you might like" or "What other people who purchased this book also bought" - another way to squeeze a few more dollars out of users. Alternatively you could say this 'use of information' acts as a benefit to the user. I however am a tad more cynical.



Web 3.0 also refers to the use of Hyper-localisation (not too sure about the spelling on that one) which is news for your specific area. Hyper-localisation is about 'specific content delivery' meaning news your way and advertising specific to you. Although this is an interesting development of journalism, I feel that it allows ignorance of other, potentially more important issues that are happening elsewhere. For example, on channel 9 at around 5:30 (just before the news) the show Extra informs Queensland viewers on 'great banana prices' and other local topics. The boring, not so thrilling end of Journalism.

A big part of what Hyper-localisation allows is ethnocentricity. This ignorance of what is happening in other countries was discussed in the lecture. It strongly applies to Hyper-localisation.

Furthermore, online news was also discussed in the second lecture. We learnt that only 14% of people would pay for web news. How pathetic. Clearly the once exciting future of Journalism, the new world of the internet, is actually heading for the toilet. No payment means no investigative Journalism.  Only sponsored stories included, not for the benefit for the reader or the story, but so the sponsor gets coverage and the writer gets a shiny check.

Yet Bruce made an interesting point with jelly beans. He suggested that by giving us jelly beans for free (as how online Journalism has been for a few years now) and then changing your mind and saying "Hey, I want you to pay for those jelly beans actually. Pay up or give back" was seen as a rib off.
Simply because humans by nature feel that they shouldn't have to pay for what was once free. Even though we all understand that money doesn't grow on trees and EVERYTHING requires funding. At least good Journalism does.

The online Herald Sun was the first tabloid to go behind the paywall (another topic that was discussed in the second lecture) on February 27 2012. A year before this, the online Brisbane News went behind the pay wall in October of 2011. More including the Courier Mail and Brisbane Times are expected to follow eventually.

Imagine if all online newspapers went behind a pay wall and only 14% of people were interested in subscribing? Big shut downs would be the consequence. That and a overload of advertisement before hand. Where would all of the great Journalists go? Find work elsewhere would be the answer. As a result, Journalism at large would suffer. Only the sell-outs would stick around. Tis a sad place where we might be headed...

Media Use Survey

Each student of Intro to Jou 1111 was asked to complete a simple survey regarding their everyday use of different medias. Questions about types (Internet, TV, books, newspapers etc), length of period spent on each type (1-2 hours, 3-4 hours etc) and more was asked. 

The purpose of this media survey was for us to use in future. 

Once we have completed our own 10 day survey on our media use, we are able to compare ourselves to our fellow classmates. Using data against data if you will. 

It only took my a few minutes, less than 10, to complete my survey and I am interested to see the overall results of all students in Intro to Jour 1111. 

-Merryn

Lecture 1 - Slides that spoke to me

Tina Fey Quote on TV Journalists. I adore her. She's so funny. But she has a point... only with some Journalists..
"... egomaniacs of average intelligence or less, often end up in the field of TV Journalism."


Lecture 1

Ah the first lecture of Introduction to Journalism 1111. This first lecture was my very first at the University of Queensland. Good times. 

I was not however my very first Uni lecture, as I have previously studied at QUT (creative Industries) but that dark phase was behind me. 

After arriving late to my very first lecture of my very first subject at my very second uni, I found myself in the schonell theatre. The hall was not empty, nor full. The lecturer not dead, not dull - Bruce Redman was on stage. 

He discussed the overview of assessment for the subject. The media use diary, the blog (this one!) and a factual story and more. 

That was the summary of the first lecture. An overview of assessment and the future subject that was to come. We all received a hand out for the subject, including the same information that could be found on BlackBoard. 

Was an easy first lecture. It might have been hard to take in any additional information, what we would actually need to know for the subject, but it would have made the lecture worth attending. Everything I learnt in that first lecture I could have easily learnt at home on BlackBoard.

That is all. 

-Merryn.  


What's is all about?

Hello there. How nice of you to stop by and visit my blog. So good to have you here. Would you care for a cup of tea? No? Thats fine, I can't provide you with one as this is a blog. Ha.

The intended purpose of this blog is diverse as it is fun. 

On a serious level, this blog is for my Introduction to Journalism 1111 subject at UQ. I am to reflect on my use of media (what kinds and how much) and review/share my opinions of the content of the 1111 Lectures.  

On a more unique note, I shall be sharing my own personal interests. This will include news stories that interest me, my hobbies, how journalism is changing and other odd things here and there. 

I sincerely hope you enjoy :)

Let me know if you change your mind on that cup of tea ;P

-Merryn